Published on

Component Architecture

Authors

Designing and implementing the structure of your React components is an important aspect of web development that has a significant impact on code maintenance, scalability, and readability. The architecture of your components influences how your app behaves, so it's crucial to consider the various methods you can utilize. Here are several popular approaches, each with its unique advantages and potential drawbacks:

Below is more in-depth example of each method

  1. Components Mapping Method:

    • The Components Mapping approach is a dynamic method where you employ an object to map different components. This approach is highly extensible and contributes to keeping your code clean and easy to read. Here's how it might look:The significant advantages of this method are its flexibility and ease of code extension. However, it can be a bit complex when you first encounter it.

      const components = {
  component1: <Component1 />,
  component2: <Component2 />,
  // Add more as needed
};

// Rendering component
render() {
  return <div>{this.components[this.props.componentName]}</div>;
}

  2. Clsx Tailwind Variant:

    • If you're working with the Tailwind CSS framework, consider the Clsx library. It offers a mechanism for composing class names dynamically, which can be particularly beneficial when prototyping rapidly. Here's a basic example:Although this method is extremely powerful for fast prototyping, it can become verbose and potentially challenging to read as your application scales.

      import clsx from 'clsx'

function Component() {
  return <div className={clsx('text-center', 'text-blue-500')}>Hello, world!</div>
}

  3. SCSS className Composition:

    • If you favor working with SCSS, this approach provides excellent opportunities for extensibility, composition, and reusability. This method requires a solid understanding of SCSS, but its readability and structuring power can be a real boon. Here's an example of how this method can be employed:One downside is the additional setup needed for SCSS processing. However, the payoff in clean, reusable code can make this investment well worthwhile.

      .btn {
  // common button styles

  &--primary {
    // primary button styles
  }

  &--secondary {
    // secondary button styles
  }
}